in Re Government Employees Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Donna Stewart

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 27, 2015
Docket09-15-00436-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Government Employees Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Donna Stewart (in Re Government Employees Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Donna Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Government Employees Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Donna Stewart, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________

NO. 09-15-00436-CV __________________

IN RE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF DONNA STEWART __________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 1 of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 126059 __________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before the Court is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator

Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), as subrogee of Donna

Stewart, regarding an order entered by the trial court that requires production of

documents pertaining to GEICO’s payment of claims involving charges and fees

associated with the towing and storage of its insureds’ vehicles in Jefferson,

Orange, and Hardin Counties. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the

parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).

1 Geico contends the discovery order is overly broad and orders the

production of irrelevant documents, and Geico seeks a writ of mandamus

compelling the trial judge to vacate the discovery order. Concurrently with the

filing of its petition for writ of mandamus, GEICO filed a motion for emergency

stay. GEICO contends an emergency stay is necessary to maintain the status quo

and preserve this Court’s jurisdiction, and that it will be prejudiced by being forced

to disclose documents before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus

are resolved.

The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It

is ORDERED that the trial court’s order of September 25, 2015, is STAYED until

further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of

the relator as a condition to any relief herein granted. The response of the real party

in interest is due November 6, 2015.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED October 27, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Government Employees Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Donna Stewart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-government-employees-insurance-company-as-subrogee-of-donna-stewart-texapp-2015.