In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann

57 A.2d 31, 141 N.J. Eq. 271, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 618
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 29, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order of the Chancellor, upon the advice of Vice-Chancellor Stein, discharging an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying an application therefor.

Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that reasonable cause was not shown. The'writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. £9 C. J. S., Habeas Corpus, § -6.

The order under review is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Rreund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann, 57 A.2d 31, 141 N.J. Eq. 271, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 618 (N.J. 1948).

57 A.2d 31 (In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cynkowski
88 A.2d 220 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
In Re Application of Zee
80 A.2d 480 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)