In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann

57 A.2d 31, 141 N.J. Eq. 271, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 618
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A.2d 31 (In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Gottsmann Ex Rel. Gottsmann, 57 A.2d 31, 141 N.J. Eq. 271, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 618 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order of the Chancellor, upon the advice of Vice-Chancellor Stein, discharging an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying an application therefor.

Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that reasonable cause was not shown. The'writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. £9 C. J. S., Habeas Corpus, § -6.

The order under review is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Rreund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cynkowski
88 A.2d 220 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
In Re Application of Zee
80 A.2d 480 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 31, 141 N.J. Eq. 271, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gottsmann-ex-rel-gottsmann-nj-1948.