In re Gottesman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gottesman

599 A.2d 157, 126 N.J. 376, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1279

DecidedDecember 11, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 599 A.2d 157 (In re Gottesman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gottesman, 599 A.2d 157, 126 N.J. 376, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1279 (N.J. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MICHAEL H. GOTTESMAN of AS-BURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be publicly reprimanded for violation of DR 3-102 (dividing legal fees with a non-lawyer) and DR 3-101 (aiding the unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary review are adopted and MICHAEL H. GOTTESMAN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

[377]*377ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MICHAEL H. GOTTESMAN of AS-BURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be publicly reprimanded for violation of DR 3-102 (dividing legal fees with a non-lawyer) and DR 3-101 (aiding the unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary review are adopted and MICHAEL H. GOTTESMAN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

[377]*377ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 A.2d 157, 126 N.J. 376, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gottesman-nj-1991.