In re Gotham Tissue Corp.

269 A.D. 922, 57 N.Y.S.2d 550
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 922 (In re Gotham Tissue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gotham Tissue Corp., 269 A.D. 922, 57 N.Y.S.2d 550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Appeal from an order at Special Term dated July 20, 1945, denying a motion by appellants, Michael Gilman and Mary Gilman, to dismiss the petition of Benjamin F. Picola for a dissolution of the Gotham Tissue Corporation, and to vacate an order of Honorable Martin W. Deyo to show canse why such corporation should not be dissolved, which orde,r to show cause .was made returnable before the referee. A similar proceeding was brought for the dissolution of the Gotham Paper Mills, Inc. In that case the issues raised are the same and affect the same parties. By stipulation the appeals have been consolidated and only the papers in the Gotham Tissue Corporation are before the court. The petition was brought under section 103 of the General Corporation Law by the holders of one half of the stock entitled to vote at an election of directors. Dissolution is sought upon the claim, that the corporation has an equal number of directors who are equally divided regarding the management of the affairs of the corporation. The petition is attacked upon the ground that it fails to show the jurisdictional requirements of the General Corporation Law for various reasons. The propriety of dissolving the corporation will be determined by the referee. Only the sufficiency of the petition is for the consideration of this court. The petition states sufficient facts to comply with the statutes. Order denying motion to dismiss the petition and denying the motion to vacate the order to show cause is affirmed, with $10 costs in each case. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Hy-Lite Plastics, Inc.
8 Misc. 2d 101 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Radom & Neidorff, Inc.
119 N.E.2d 563 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
In re Audio-Scriptions, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 922, 57 N.Y.S.2d 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gotham-tissue-corp-nyappdiv-1945.