In re Gornostayoff
This text of 113 Cal. App. 255 (In re Gornostayoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for habeas corpus.
Petitioner is detained by virtue of a warrant issued by the Governor of this state, directing the extradition of petitioner to the state of Ohio. It is alleged in the petition that the Governor’s warrant is based upon an indictment filed against petitioner in the state of Ohio on the seventeenth day of November, 1927, in which said indictment petitioner is charged with having committed a felony on the fifteenth day of November, 1927, to wit: With having failed to support two minor children. Petitioner claims he was not within the demanding state on said last-mentioned date. There is no merit in the petition. Considering the character of the offense with which he is charged, his presence within the state was not necessary to enable him to commit the saíne. Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 Cal. App. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gornostayoff-calctapp-1931.