In re Gorman

134 A.3d 441, 224 N.J. 449, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 486
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 11, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.3d 441 (In re Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gorman, 134 A.3d 441, 224 N.J. 449, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 486 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule l:20-15(k) a recommendation (DRB 16-076) that MATTHEW M. GORMAN of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2012, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the determination of the District IIB Fee Arbitration Committee in District Docket No. IIB-2015-0015F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MATTHEW M. GORMAN be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective May 11, 2016, and until respondent complies with the determination of the District IIB Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. IIB-2015-0015F, pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, this Order shall be vacated automatically if the Disciplinary Review Board reports to the Court that prior to the effective date of suspension, respondent has satisfied all obligations under this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.3d 441, 224 N.J. 449, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gorman-nj-2016.