In re Gore

880 A.2d 1211
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 12, 2005
DocketNo. 1015 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 880 A.2d 1211 (In re Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gore, 880 A.2d 1211 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2005, James Grafton Gore, Jr., having been dis[1212]*1212barred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland by Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed April 5, 2004; the said James Grafton Gore, Jr., having been directed on April 27, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that James Grafton Gore, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall compy with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 A.2d 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gore-pa-2005.