In re Gore

Fourth Circuit

In re Gore

98 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2004·No. No. 04-6114·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court. Gore filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion on June 13, 2002. The district court ruled on the motion on [263] February 25, 2004, after Gore filed the mandamus petition. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant Gore’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court. Gore filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion on June 13, 2002. The district court ruled on the motion on [263] February 25, 2004, after Gore filed the mandamus petition. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant Gore’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

In re Gore, 98 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 262 (In re Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related