In re Gordon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gordon

656 A.2d 434, 139 N.J. 606, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 181

DecidedApril 26, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 656 A.2d 434 (In re Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gordon, 656 A.2d 434, 139 N.J. 606, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 181 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on March 14,1995, recommending that MARC J. GORDON of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1959, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep client informed) and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return file to client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARC J. GORDON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that- the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on March 14,1995, recommending that MARC J. GORDON of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1959, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep client informed) and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return file to client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARC J. GORDON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that- the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 A.2d 434, 139 N.J. 606, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gordon-nj-1995.