In re Gorbey

544 F. App'x 193
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2013·No. No. 13-1772·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this court directing the district court to serve on Respondent his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petitions and order a response. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that Gorbey’s petitions were served on Respondent, and Respondent has filed responsive pleadings. Accordingly, because Gorbey has received the relief he seeks, we grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gorbey, 544 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2013).

544 F. App'x 193 (In re Gorbey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related