In Re GOOGLE LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re GOOGLE LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 F.4th 1379
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 5, 2025·No. 23-2119·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-2119 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 02/05/2025

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: GOOGLE LLC, Appellant ______________________

2023-2119 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/394,586. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ARTHUR JOHN ARGALL, III, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANDREW V. TRASK, MICHAEL THOMAS ZAKRAJSEK.

ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Coke Morgan Stewart. Also represented by MAI- TRANG DUC DANG, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 23-2119 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 02/05/2025

PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 5, 2025 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re GOOGLE LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2025).

In Re GOOGLE LLC (In Re GOOGLE LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.