In re Goodwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Goodwin

107 A.3d 677, 220 N.J. 487, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 130

DecidedFebruary 12, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.3d 677 (In re Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goodwin, 107 A.3d 677, 220 N.J. 487, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-142, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that RAYMOND GOODWIN of SOMERSET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 20, 2011, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND GOODWIN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent remain suspended from the practice of law pursuant to the Order filed September 20, 2011 (D-5-11; 069123) pending his compliance, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[488]*488ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-142, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that RAYMOND GOODWIN of SOMERSET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 20, 2011, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND GOODWIN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent remain suspended from the practice of law pursuant to the Order filed September 20, 2011 (D-5-11; 069123) pending his compliance, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[488]*488ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.3d 677, 220 N.J. 487, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goodwin-nj-2015.