In re Goodell

81 N.W. 551, 48 Wis. 693, 1879 Wisc. LEXIS 205
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 81 N.W. 551 (In re Goodell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Goodell, 81 N.W. 551, 48 Wis. 693, 1879 Wisc. LEXIS 205 (Wis. 1879).

Opinion

Oole, J.

On the. former application for the admission of Miss Eavinia Gooclell to the bar of this court, it was held that there was no statutory authority for the admission of females to the bar of any court of this state. 39 "Wis., 232. Since that decision was made, the legislature has provided that “ no person shall be denied admission or license to practice as an attorney in any court of this state' on account of sex ” (subd. 5, sec. 2586,'K. S. 1878), which removes the objection founded upon a want of legislative authority to admit females to practice. It may admit of serious doubt whether, under the constitution of this state, the legislature has the absolute [694]*694and exclusive power to declare wbo shall be admitted as attorneys to practice in the courts of this state; or whether the courts themselves, as a necessary and inherent part of their powers, have not full control over the subject. It was said by the chief justice, on the previous application, that it was a grave question whether the constitution does not' entrust the rule of admissions to the bar, as well as of expulsion from it, exclusively to the discretion of the courts, as a part of their judicial power. But it was further remarked by the chief justice, that the legislature had from time to time assumed the power to prescribe rules for the admission of attorneys, and, when those rules have seemed reasonable and just, it has generally been the pleasure of the courts to act upon such statutes, in deference to the wishes of a coordinate branch of the government, without considering the question of power. A majority of the court are disposed to pursue the same course now, and act upon the statute above cited, waiving for the present the question whether or not the courts are vested with the ultimate power under the constitution of regulating and determining for themselves as to who are entitled to admission to practice: We are satisfied that the applicant possesses all the requisite qualifications as to learning, ability and moral character to entitle her to admission, no objection existing thereto except that founded upon her sex alone. ITnder the circumstances, a majority think that objection must be disregarded. Miss Goodell will therefore be admitted to practice in this court upon signing the roll and taking the prescribed oath.

By the Court. — So ordered.

RyaN, C. J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swenson v. Northern Crop Insurance, Inc.
498 N.W.2d 174 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)
State Ex Rel. Fiedler v. Wisconsin Senate
454 N.W.2d 770 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1990)
In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943
12 N.W.2d 699 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1943)
State v. Cannon
221 N.W. 603 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1928)
Wick v. Wick
212 N.W. 787 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)
In re Application for License to Practice Law
67 S.E. 597 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
In Re Maddox
55 L.R.A. 298 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.W. 551, 48 Wis. 693, 1879 Wisc. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goodell-wis-1879.