In Re Gomez

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Gomez

987 A.2d 615, 201 N.J. 117

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 16, 2010·No. D-52 September Term 2009, 065250·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-274, concluding that ANDRYS SOFIA GOMEZ of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State *118 in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDRYS SOFIA GOMEZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney .at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-274, concluding that ANDRYS SOFIA GOMEZ of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State *118 in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDRYS SOFIA GOMEZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney .at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In Re Gomez, 987 A.2d 615, 201 N.J. 117 (N.J. 2010).

Pincite

987 A.2d 615 (In Re Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.