In re Goldston

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Goldston

694 A.2d 541, 149 N.J. 412, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 173

DecidedJune 6, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 694 A.2d 541 (In re Goldston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldston, 694 A.2d 541, 149 N.J. 412, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 173 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on February 14, 1997, recommending that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982 and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated March 28, 1995, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred for the knowing misappropriation of client funds, in violation of RPC 1.15 and RPC 8.4(c), and for failure to cooperate with the District Ethics Committee, in violation of RPC 8.1(b) and R. 1:20 — 3(g)(3);

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

[413]*413It is ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON be disbarred, effective immediately, and his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on February 14, 1997, recommending that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982 and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated March 28, 1995, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred for the knowing misappropriation of client funds, in violation of RPC 1.15 and RPC 8.4(c), and for failure to cooperate with the District Ethics Committee, in violation of RPC 8.1(b) and R. 1:20 — 3(g)(3);

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

[413]*413It is ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON be disbarred, effective immediately, and his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that WAYLAND H. GOLDSTON reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 A.2d 541, 149 N.J. 412, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldston-nj-1997.