In re Goldstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Goldstein

655 A.2d 502

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 7, 1995

DocketNo. 394, Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 655 A.2d 502 (In re Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldstein, 655 A.2d 502 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 28, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 28, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 A.2d 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldstein-pa-1995.