In re Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Goldstein

99 A.D.2d 820, 472 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 820 (In re Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldstein, 99 A.D.2d 820, 472 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner (1) to have a default judgment entered against respondent upon his failure to file an answer to the petition with this court and (2) to have the respondent suspended from the practice of law until such time [821]*821as he submits to a physical examination, and until satisfactory proof is submitted that respondent is not so addicted. Motion granted. This court finds the respondent, Robert L. Goldstein, who was admitted to practice in this court on February 21, 1973 under the name Robert Lawrence Goldstein, to be in default in failing to file an answer and in failing to comply with this court’s order dated August 3, 1983, which directed him to submit to a physical examination regarding his fitness to practice law. The respondent, Robert L. Goldstein, is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner (1) to have a default judgment entered against respondent upon his failure to file an answer to the petition with this court and (2) to have the respondent suspended from the practice of law until such time [821]*821as he submits to a physical examination, and until satisfactory proof is submitted that respondent is not so addicted. Motion granted. This court finds the respondent, Robert L. Goldstein, who was admitted to practice in this court on February 21, 1973 under the name Robert Lawrence Goldstein, to be in default in failing to file an answer and in failing to comply with this court’s order dated August 3, 1983, which directed him to submit to a physical examination regarding his fitness to practice law. The respondent, Robert L. Goldstein, is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 820, 472 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldstein-nyappdiv-1984.