Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Goldstein

In re Goldstein

687 A.2d 265, 147 N.J. 286, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 16, 1997·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on August 5, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JERROLD D. GOLD-STEIN of NORTH PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, should be reprimanded for violating R. 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15, by failing to comply with attorney recordkeeping requirements and by negligently misappropriating client funds, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JERROLD D. GOLDSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[287] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Goldstein, 687 A.2d 265, 147 N.J. 286, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 28 (N.J. 1997).

687 A.2d 265 (In re Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.