In re Goldstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Goldstein

687 A.2d 265, 147 N.J. 286, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 28

DecidedJanuary 16, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 687 A.2d 265 (In re Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldstein, 687 A.2d 265, 147 N.J. 286, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 28 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on August 5, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JERROLD D. GOLD-STEIN of NORTH PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, should be reprimanded for violating R. 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15, by failing to comply with attorney recordkeeping requirements and by negligently misappropriating client funds, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JERROLD D. GOLDSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[287]*287ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on August 5, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JERROLD D. GOLD-STEIN of NORTH PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, should be reprimanded for violating R. 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15, by failing to comply with attorney recordkeeping requirements and by negligently misappropriating client funds, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JERROLD D. GOLDSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[287]*287ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 A.2d 265, 147 N.J. 286, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldstein-nj-1997.