In Re Goldstein
This text of 378 B.R. 858 (In Re Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF LAGERLOF, SENEGAL, GOSNEY & KRUSE, LLP AS DIVORCE ATTORNEYS TO MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN
Debtors’ motion for leave to employ LAGERLOF, SENECAL, GOSNEY & KRUSE, LLP (“LAGERLOF”) as divorce attorney to MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN (“MICHAEL”) came on for hearing at the date, time and place set forth above.
David A. Tilem appeared on behalf of the Debtors in support of the motion. Alvin Mar appeared on behalf of the Office of the United States Trustee. There were no other appearances.
Based on the arguments of counsel and good cause appearing therefore:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Debtors are authorized to employ LAGERLOF under the terms and conditions set forth in the motion;
2. Employment of LAGERLOF is effective as of the Petition filing date;
3. LAGERLOF is authorized to do monthly draw-downs pursuant to the Professional Fee Statement procedure as established by the Office of the United States Trustee;
4. Once the retainer has been exhausted, LAGERLOF is authorized to handle subsequent invoices pursuant to the Professional Compensation Notice Procedure set forth in the motion.
5. The court reserves jurisdiction to explain further its ruling.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 B.R. 858, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4092, 2007 WL 4246059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldstein-cacb-2007.