In re Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Goldman

253 A.D. 862, 1 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 862 (In re Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldman, 253 A.D. 862, 1 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

The Superintendent of Insurance has decided that petitioner has “ violated the provisions of section 65 of the Insurance Law and is (are) not a competent and trustworthy person within the contemplation of the Insurance Law to transact an insurance brokerage business ” and has canceled his license as an insurance broker. Section 65 may be violated in numerous ways. The decision fails to comply with the requirement that findings must be made as to the identical act or acts which constitute the violation. It must be annulled. (Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten Eych, 271 N. Y. 488.) The evidence upon which the Superintendent based his decision is weak and unsatisfactory and the decision should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. (Civ. Prae. Act, art. 78, § 1296, subd. 7; Civ. Prac. Act, old § 1304, subd. 5.) Decision annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Superintendent of Insurance has decided that petitioner has “ violated the provisions of section 65 of the Insurance Law and is (are) not a competent and trustworthy person within the contemplation of the Insurance Law to transact an insurance brokerage business ” and has canceled his license as an insurance broker. Section 65 may be violated in numerous ways. The decision fails to comply with the requirement that findings must be made as to the identical act or acts which constitute the violation. It must be annulled. (Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten Eych, 271 N. Y. 488.) The evidence upon which the Superintendent based his decision is weak and unsatisfactory and the decision should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. (Civ. Prae. Act, art. 78, § 1296, subd. 7; Civ. Prac. Act, old § 1304, subd. 5.) Decision annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 862, 1 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldman-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack