In re Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Goldman

253 A.D. 862, 1 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8938

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Superintendent of Insurance has decided that petitioner has “ violated the provisions of section 65 of the Insurance Law and is (are) not a competent and trustworthy person within the contemplation of the Insurance Law to transact an insurance brokerage business ” and has canceled his license as an insurance broker. Section 65 may be violated in numerous ways. The decision fails to comply with the requirement that findings must be made as to the identical act or acts which constitute the violation. It must be annulled. (Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten Eych, 271 N. Y. 488.) The evidence upon which the Superintendent based his decision is weak and unsatisfactory and the decision should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. (Civ. Prae. Act, art. 78, § 1296, subd. 7; Civ. Prac. Act, old § 1304, subd. 5.) Decision annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Superintendent of Insurance has decided that petitioner has “ violated the provisions of section 65 of the Insurance Law and is (are) not a competent and trustworthy person within the contemplation of the Insurance Law to transact an insurance brokerage business ” and has canceled his license as an insurance broker. Section 65 may be violated in numerous ways. The decision fails to comply with the requirement that findings must be made as to the identical act or acts which constitute the violation. It must be annulled. (Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten Eych, 271 N. Y. 488.) The evidence upon which the Superintendent based his decision is weak and unsatisfactory and the decision should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. (Civ. Prae. Act, art. 78, § 1296, subd. 7; Civ. Prac. Act, old § 1304, subd. 5.) Decision annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

In re Goldman, 253 A.D. 862, 1 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 862 (In re Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related