In re Goldman

129 F. 212, 63 C.C.A. 370, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1904
DocketNo. 188
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 129 F. 212 (In re Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Goldman, 129 F. 212, 63 C.C.A. 370, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040 (2d Cir. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have no doubt of the power of the court to reopen the estate of the bankrupt or of the right of the trustee to maintain action necessary to recover concealed assets. But the motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the District Judge, and we are not satisfied that it was not properly exercised, in the interests of preventing litigation of insignificant importance. Had the application been made by the original creditors it would be regarded with more favor. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Congoleum Corporation v.
Third Circuit, 2025
Mohonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe Stores
111 F.2d 287 (Second Circuit, 1940)
In Re Schreiber
23 F.2d 428 (Second Circuit, 1928)
In re Carlucci Stone Co.
269 F. 795 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1920)
In re Graff
250 F. 997 (Second Circuit, 1918)
Duncan v. Watson
73 So. 448 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 F. 212, 63 C.C.A. 370, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldman-ca2-1904.