In re Golding

254 A.D. 778, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570

This text of 254 A.D. 778 (In re Golding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Golding, 254 A.D. 778, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying the motion of the respondents-appellants to strike certain designated allegations from the amended petition affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 778, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-golding-nyappdiv-1938.