In re Golding

254 A.D. 778, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying the motion of the respondents-appellants to strike certain designated allegations from the amended petition affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Golding, 254 A.D. 778, 6 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 778 (In re Golding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.