in Re: Goldfarb, PLLC

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 13, 2018
• Docket: 05-18-01203-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed December 13, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01203-CV

IN RE GOLDFARB, PLLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-03747

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which relator complains of

the trial court’s order severing the claims it asserted in its petition in intervention. To be entitled

to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion

and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,

135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has

not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines

relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

181203F.P05 /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE