In re Golden
This text of 285 A.D. 927 (In re Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—■ Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to eliminate from the first decretal provision the concluding words “but this increase in respondent’s rent is to take effect only as of December 1, 1954,” without costs of this appeal. There was no warrant in law or in the exercise of discretion for fixing the effective date of the fair rental value other than the “ date [of] the application to the supreme court ” (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 4, subd. 1, as amd.; Matter of Flatto [Sandler], 279 App. Div. 714; Matter of FrmJcel [Fder], 277 App. Div. 968). Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 927, 138 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-golden-nyappdiv-1955.