In Re Golden Cruller & Doughnut Co.

D. New Jersey

In Re Golden Cruller & Doughnut Co.

6 F.2d 1015, 3 N.J. Misc. 479, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1191

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey

DecidedMay 5, 1925

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 F.2d 1015 (In Re Golden Cruller & Doughnut Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Golden Cruller & Doughnut Co., 6 F.2d 1015, 3 N.J. Misc. 479, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1191 (D.N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

*1016 BODINE, District Judge.

On May 20, 1924, a voluntary petition in bankruptcy was filed in the above matter. Schedules attached to the petition showed that the petitioner held conditional sales contracts to secure the unpaid balance upon two automobiles, the property o£ the bankrupt. The conditional sales contracts were not recorded until the following day. There were no judgment or lien creditors. The referee in bankruptcy held tljat the conditional sales contracts were void as against the trustee in bankruptcy.

Section 5 of-the Uniform Conditional Sales Act, adopted by New Jersey in 1919 (P. L. p. 462), makes conditional sales contracts, although unrecorded, valid as against all persons except: “Any purchaser from or creditor of the buyer, who, without notice of such provision, purchases the goods or acquires by attachment or levy a lien upon them, before the contract or a copy thereof shall be filed.”

It is not necessary to determine the scope of section 47a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9631). There is a considerable body of authority to support the proposition that a trustee steps merely into the shoes of an existing creditor. See Live Stock State Bank v. Doyle, trustee (C. C. A.) 292 F. 465, and cases there cited; also Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 245 U. S. 513, 38 S. Ct. 176, 62 L. Ed. 441.

The matter has not been passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The judges in this district have not, however, followed Judge Kenyon’s admiraable decision in the Eighth Circuit. The question, however, is not necessary to the disposition of this ease. Assuming, but not deciding, that where there are no judgment creditors the trustee is in the same position as a creditor who has procured a lien by judgment, the trustee in this case acquired no rights before having actual notice'of the conditional sales contract; the schedules in bankruptcy exploiting such sales contracts.

The finding of the referee must be r& versed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1016 BODINE, District Judge.

On May 20, 1924, a voluntary petition in bankruptcy was filed in the above matter. Schedules attached to the petition showed that the petitioner held conditional sales contracts to secure the unpaid balance upon two automobiles, the property o£ the bankrupt. The conditional sales contracts were not recorded until the following day. There were no judgment or lien creditors. The referee in bankruptcy held tljat the conditional sales contracts were void as against the trustee in bankruptcy.

Section 5 of-the Uniform Conditional Sales Act, adopted by New Jersey in 1919 (P. L. p. 462), makes conditional sales contracts, although unrecorded, valid as against all persons except: “Any purchaser from or creditor of the buyer, who, without notice of such provision, purchases the goods or acquires by attachment or levy a lien upon them, before the contract or a copy thereof shall be filed.”

It is not necessary to determine the scope of section 47a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9631). There is a considerable body of authority to support the proposition that a trustee steps merely into the shoes of an existing creditor. See Live Stock State Bank v. Doyle, trustee (C. C. A.) 292 F. 465, and cases there cited; also Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 245 U. S. 513, 38 S. Ct. 176, 62 L. Ed. 441.

The matter has not been passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The judges in this district have not, however, followed Judge Kenyon’s admiraable decision in the Eighth Circuit. The question, however, is not necessary to the disposition of this ease. Assuming, but not deciding, that where there are no judgment creditors the trustee is in the same position as a creditor who has procured a lien by judgment, the trustee in this case acquired no rights before having actual notice'of the conditional sales contract; the schedules in bankruptcy exploiting such sales contracts.

The finding of the referee must be r& versed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F.2d 1015, 3 N.J. Misc. 479, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-golden-cruller-doughnut-co-njd-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack