in Re: Golden Corral Corporation
This text of in Re: Golden Corral Corporation (in Re: Golden Corral Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN RE: GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and
Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief
On January 11, 2007, relator, Golden Corral Corporation, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which they allege that on November 15, 2006, the respondent, the Honorable Arnoldo Cantu, Jr., Presiding Judge of the County Court at Law No. 5 in Hidalgo County, Texas, abused his discretion by denying relator's motion to compel arbitration and motion to stay litigation proceedings.
Relator's petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the respondent to vacate the November 15, 2006 order, and enter an order compelling arbitration between relator, Golden Corral Corporation, and real party in interest, Pablo De La Rosa, and to stay litigation proceedings.
Having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response of the real parties in interest, this Court is of the opinion that the relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 15th day of February, 2007.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Golden Corral Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-golden-corral-corporation-texapp-2007.