In re Goldberg

167 F. 808, 93 C.C.A. 203, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 1909
DocketNo. 123
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 167 F. 808 (In re Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Goldberg, 167 F. 808, 93 C.C.A. 203, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4392 (2d Cir. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition by the bankrupt to revise an order of the District Court, Southern District of New York. On March 6, 1907, petitioner was adjudicated a bankrupt. He did not appeal, and the time limited by the statute (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 25a (3), 30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432]) for taking an appeal expired in March, 1907. A year later, March 23, 1908, he moved the District Court to vacate the order of adjudication; his application was denied. This is merely an attempt indirectly to extend the time within which to review the adjudication of bankruptcy. That cannot be done. Matter of Berkebile, 144 Fed. 577, 75 C. C. A. 333.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonner v. Potterf
47 F.2d 852 (Tenth Circuit, 1931)
Simpson v. Macomber
264 F. 913 (Ninth Circuit, 1920)
Hunter, Walton & Co. v. J. G. Cherry Co.
247 F. 458 (Eighth Circuit, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 F. 808, 93 C.C.A. 203, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldberg-ca2-1909.