In re Gokhale

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gokhale

782 A.2d 918, 170 N.J. 3, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1112

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-077, concluding that VIJAY M. GOKHALE of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) (record-keeping deficiencies) and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that VIJAY M. GOKHALE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-077, concluding that VIJAY M. GOKHALE of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) (record-keeping deficiencies) and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that VIJAY M. GOKHALE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Gokhale, 782 A.2d 918, 170 N.J. 3, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1112 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

782 A.2d 918 (In re Gokhale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.