in Re: Godfrey Garcia
This text of in Re: Godfrey Garcia (in Re: Godfrey Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-458-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE GODFREY GARCIA
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Godfrey Garcia, filed a motion for new trial and request for appointment of counsel in the above cause on September 2, 2004. Based on the allegations and arguments therein, we construe these pleadings as a petition for writ of mandamus and review it accordingly.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief
sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 9th day of September, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Godfrey Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-godfrey-garcia-texapp-2004.