In re Glucksman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Glucksman

261 A.D. 947, 26 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8241

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 947 (In re Glucksman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Glucksman, 261 A.D. 947, 26 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinions

The decree denies petitioner’s application for a determination that a certain indenture, bearing date the 7th day of November, 1935, made by decedent, wherein she provided for payment of £1,000 to her daughter, Carmen Sylvia Bernheim, and two wills made by said decedent, one made in Jamaica, British West Indies, and the other in New York city, and the codicil to the will made in New York city be construed to mean that the decedent intended said £1,000 to be paid out of decedent’s property in New York.

Decree affirmed, with costs to the respondents payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in opinion in which Cohn, J., concurs. [174 Misc. 923.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The decree denies petitioner’s application for a determination that a certain indenture, bearing date the 7th day of November, 1935, made by decedent, wherein she provided for payment of £1,000 to her daughter, Carmen Sylvia Bernheim, and two wills made by said decedent, one made in Jamaica, British West Indies, and the other in New York city, and the codicil to the will made in New York city be construed to mean that the decedent intended said £1,000 to be paid out of decedent’s property in New York.

Decree affirmed, with costs to the respondents payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in opinion in which Cohn, J., concurs. [174 Misc. 923.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 947, 26 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glucksman-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack