In re Gloss

New York Court of Appeals

In re Gloss

622 N.E.2d 294, 82 N.Y.2d 734

DecidedSeptember 7, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 622 N.E.2d 294 (In re Gloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gloss, 622 N.E.2d 294, 82 N.Y.2d 734 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Roger W. Gloss is suspended with pay, effective immediately, from his office of Justice of the Sheridan Town Court, Chautauqua County, pending disposition of his request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Roger W. Gloss is suspended with pay, effective immediately, from his office of Justice of the Sheridan Town Court, Chautauqua County, pending disposition of his request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 N.E.2d 294, 82 N.Y.2d 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gloss-ny-1993.