in Re: Glory Hopkins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 2006
Docket14-06-00008-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Glory Hopkins (in Re: Glory Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Glory Hopkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00008-CV

IN RE GLORY HOPKINS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On January 6, 2006, relator, Glory Hopkins, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2005); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. '' 161.009, 273.061 (Vernon 1986); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing Eric Thode, County Chairman of the Republican Party of Fort Bend County, to accept her application and certify her for placement on the Republican party general primary ballot as a candidate for the District Clerk of Fort Bend County.  Thode rejected relator=s application because it was not received by January 2, 2006, at 6:00 p.m.


Relator seeks equitable relief from the statutory deadline to file her application for a place on the general primary election ballot.  See Tex. Elec. Code Ann. '' 172.023(a) (Vernon 1986).  As relevant to this case, courts may fashion an equitable remedy, including extension of a statutory deadline, to correct an official=s violation of a statutory duty.  See In re Gamble, 71 S.W.3d 313, 318 (Tex. 2002).  On this record, relator has not established that the failure to timely file her application resulted from the violation of a statutory duty.

Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Gamble
71 S.W.3d 313 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Glory Hopkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glory-hopkins-texapp-2006.