in Re Gloria Zarate
This text of in Re Gloria Zarate (in Re Gloria Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 2, 2014
No. 04-14-00462-CV
IN RE Gloria ZARATE
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On June 27, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on July 2nd, 2014.
_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of July, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10-08-49259, styled Green Tree Servicing, LLC as Successor Servicer for BAHS- A Division of Bank of America, FSB v. Gloria T. Zarate and Rene Zarate Jr., pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Gloria Zarate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gloria-zarate-texapp-2014.