In re Glinbizzi
This text of 201 A.3d 1267 (In re Glinbizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB
*126817-123 concluding that RAPHAEL J. GLINBIZZI of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be censured for violating RPC 1.9(c) (using information relating to a former representation to the disadvantage of the former client); RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct **583involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that RAPHAEL J. GLINBIZZI is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.3d 1267, 236 N.J. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glinbizzi-nj-2018.