In re Glick

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Glick

798 A.2d 1247, 172 N.J. 319, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 759

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 5, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-151, concluding that ADAM H. GLICK of BOGOTA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard funds of a third party) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

[320] It is ORDERED that ADAM H. GLICK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-151, concluding that ADAM H. GLICK of BOGOTA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard funds of a third party) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

[320] It is ORDERED that ADAM H. GLICK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Glick, 798 A.2d 1247, 172 N.J. 319, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 759 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

798 A.2d 1247 (In re Glick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related