In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)

2019 VT 24
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel). Read the opinion of the Court — 209 A.3d 570
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 27, 2019·No. 2018-112·Published

Opinion

ENTRY ORDER 2019 VT 24

SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2018-112 MARCH TERM, 2019

In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. } Original Jurisdiction: (Office of Disciplinary Counsel) } } Professional Responsibility Board }

} PRB DOCKET NO. 2013-172

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

¶ 1. Regarding respondent’s motion for clarification in the above-captioned matter, we clarify that the date of this Court’s order, February 22, 2019, is the effective date of respondent’s disbarment for purposes of calculating the five-year period before respondent may apply for readmission.

BY THE COURT:

Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice

Publish Beth Robinson, Associate Justice Do Not Publish

Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice

Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice

Dennis R. Pearson, Superior Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel), 2019 VT 24 (Vt. 2019).

2019 VT 24 (In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.