In re Glasner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Glasner

155 A.3d 982, 228 N.J. 158, 2017 WL 1102839, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 319

DecidedMarch 24, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.3d 982 (In re Glasner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Glasner, 155 A.3d 982, 228 N.J. 158, 2017 WL 1102839, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-016, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that EDMUND P. GLASNER, formerly of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since January 14, 2008, by Orders of the Court filed December 14, 2007, and June 2, 2008, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with the client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDMUND P. GLASNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that EDMUND P. GLASNER remain suspended from practice pending his compliance with the Orders of the Court filed December 14, 2007, and June 2, 2008, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[159]*159ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-016, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that EDMUND P. GLASNER, formerly of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since January 14, 2008, by Orders of the Court filed December 14, 2007, and June 2, 2008, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with the client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDMUND P. GLASNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that EDMUND P. GLASNER remain suspended from practice pending his compliance with the Orders of the Court filed December 14, 2007, and June 2, 2008, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

[159]*159ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.3d 982, 228 N.J. 158, 2017 WL 1102839, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glasner-nj-2017.