In re Glaenzer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Glaenzer

67 F. 532, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3180

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 25, 1894

DocketNo. 599

StatusPublished

This text of 67 F. 532 (In re Glaenzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Glaenzer, 67 F. 532, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3180 (circtsdny 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

COXE, District Judge

(orally). The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed as to each of these importations, except the antique Oriental rug owned by and imported for Mr. George F. Baker, by the “La Champagne,” December 30, 1890. As to this importation the decision of the board is reversed in accordance with the decision of the United States circuit court of appeals in Re Glaenzer, 5 C. C. A. 225, 55 Fed. 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge

(orally). The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed as to each of these importations, except the antique Oriental rug owned by and imported for Mr. George F. Baker, by the “La Champagne,” December 30, 1890. As to this importation the decision of the board is reversed in accordance with the decision of the United States circuit court of appeals in Re Glaenzer, 5 C. C. A. 225, 55 Fed. 642.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 F. 532, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glaenzer-circtsdny-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack