In re Giruado

114 Cal. App. 348
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 25, 1931
DocketCrim. No. 215
StatusPublished

This text of 114 Cal. App. 348 (In re Giruado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Giruado, 114 Cal. App. 348 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

JENNINGS, J.

On the hearing of this matter it was stipulated by counsel that the petitioner was tried in the Justice’s Court of Calexico township for the commission of an offense in another township in Imperial County. Petitioner contends that the judgment of conviction is void by reason of want of jurisdiction. This contention is obviously correct and amply sustained by the authorities. (Antilla v. Justice's Court, 209 Cal. 621 [290 Pac. 43]; In re Bridwell, 112 Cal. App. 19 [296 Pac. 312]; In re Cohen, 107 Cal. App. 288 [290 Pac. 512].)

[349]*349The writ is granted and petitioner is discharged from custody.

Marks, Acting P. J., concurred.

Barnard, P. J., being absent, did not participate in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cohen
290 P. 512 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
In Re Bridwell
296 P. 312 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Antilla v. Justice's Court of Big River Twp.
290 P. 43 (California Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 Cal. App. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-giruado-calctapp-1931.