In re Girdler

640 A.2d 847, 135 N.J. 465, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 413
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that RICHARD B. GIRDLER of MORRISTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate) and RPC 1.5(c) (failure to obtain a signed contingent fee agreement), and respondent having previously been privately reprimanded for similar violations, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and RICHARD B. GIRDLER is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Girdler, 640 A.2d 847, 135 N.J. 465, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 413 (N.J. 1994).

640 A.2d 847 (In re Girdler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.