In re Girder Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Girder Street

134 N.Y.S. 1133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 134 N.Y.S. 1133 (In re Girder Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Girder Street, 134 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held: (1) That the appellant West is not entitled to substantial damages for the right of way; (2) that the Ziegle Brewing Company is not entitled to recover damages for the building as real estate, but only for the cost of moving and placing the same on adjoining premises. See In re Hawkstone St. in City of New York. 137 App. Div. 630, 122 N. Y. Supp. 316, affirmed 199 N. Y. 567, 93 N. E. 377; In re Briggs Avenue, 118 App. Div. 224, 102 N. Y. Supp. 1102.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held: (1) That the appellant West is not entitled to substantial damages for the right of way; (2) that the Ziegle Brewing Company is not entitled to recover damages for the building as real estate, but only for the cost of moving and placing the same on adjoining premises. See In re Hawkstone St. in City of New York. 137 App. Div. 630, 122 N. Y. Supp. 316, affirmed 199 N. Y. 567, 93 N. E. 377; In re Briggs Avenue, 118 App. Div. 224, 102 N. Y. Supp. 1102.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-girder-street-nyappdiv-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack