In re Gingold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gingold

15 A.D.2d 658, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 658 (In re Gingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gingold, 15 A.D.2d 658, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 90 of the Judiciary Law, to discipline respondent, an attorney, the Referee has filed his report in which he found that charges 5C and 5E have been established and that charge 5A has not been established, and in which he recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year. Petitioner moves to confirm the report except as to charge 5A. Respondent moves to confirm the report as to charge 5A only and to disaffirm the report in all other respects. The respective motions are denied. On the court’s own motion, the Referee’s report is confirmed in toto; and respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under section 90 of the Judiciary Law, to discipline respondent, an attorney, the Referee has filed his report in which he found that charges 5C and 5E have been established and that charge 5A has not been established, and in which he recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year. Petitioner moves to confirm the report except as to charge 5A. Respondent moves to confirm the report as to charge 5A only and to disaffirm the report in all other respects. The respective motions are denied. On the court’s own motion, the Referee’s report is confirmed in toto; and respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 658, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gingold-nyappdiv-1962.