in Re Gillette Air Condition Company
This text of in Re Gillette Air Condition Company (in Re Gillette Air Condition Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 7, 2018
No. 04-18-00503-CV
IN RE GILLETTE AIR CONDITION COMPANY
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On July 20, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion to stay the trial court proceedings. After considering the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion to stay the trial court proceedings is also DENIED. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on August 7, 2018.
_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of August, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-14754, styled Sylvia H. Rodriguez, et al. v. Michael Anthony Sanchez, et al., pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Gillette Air Condition Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gillette-air-condition-company-texapp-2018.