In re Gillespie

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gillespie

787 A.2d 878, 170 N.J. 253, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 5

DecidedJanuary 10, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 787 A.2d 878 (In re Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gillespie, 787 A.2d 878, 170 N.J. 253, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 5 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-385, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline, JAMES J. GILLESPIE, JR., of LAFAYETTE HILL, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years based on discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 10, 2000, for conduct constituting violations of RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES J. GILLESPIE, JR., is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court, effective April 10, 2000; and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is farther

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-385, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline, JAMES J. GILLESPIE, JR., of LAFAYETTE HILL, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years based on discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 10, 2000, for conduct constituting violations of RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES J. GILLESPIE, JR., is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court, effective April 10, 2000; and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is farther

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

787 A.2d 878, 170 N.J. 253, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gillespie-nj-2002.