In re Gillardon

187 F. 289, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 291
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 4, 1911
DocketNo. 3,243
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 F. 289 (In re Gillardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gillardon, 187 F. 289, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 291 (E.D. Pa. 1911).

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

[1] The bankruptcy act requires the judge himself to hear the application for discharge; but, as in other cases in equity, he may avail himself of preliminary assistance and appoint a special master.

[2] In this district, it is customary to select the person who has been acting as referee; but this is merely custom. Any other person may be appointed, in the discretion of the judge, anil, if appointed, is, of course, entitled to reasonable compensation. The act itself does not provide for his fees, and the proper amount must therefore be fixed by the court in accordance with the circumstances of the particular case. In the present controversy I think $25 is adequate for the not very serious labor that was performed by the special master, and the objecting creditors are directed to pay him this amount.

[290]*290[3] 'The master also allowed a fee to the bankrupt’s counsel, and '•charg'ed it against the objecting creditors. Whether the attorney for a' bankrupt may be allowed fees out of the estate for services in ob- , taining a discharge is a subject upon which there is some difference of opinion (Re Brundin [D. C. | 112 Fed. 306; Re Christianson [D. C.] 175 Fed. 867); but I am acquainted with no decision where such an allowance has been charged against the objecting creditors. In Pennsjdvania, at least, except in rare cases, each party to a dispute must pay his own counsel, and no sufficient reason has been advanced to justify a present departure from the rule. The exception to this allowance is therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Casper
338 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Virginia, 1972)
Folda v. Zilmer
14 F.2d 843 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 F. 289, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gillardon-paed-1911.