Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Gill

In re Gill

821 N.E.2d 559, 104 Ohio St. 3d 654
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 22, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-2017
StatusPublished

This text of 821 N.E.2d 559 (In re Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gill, 821 N.E.2d 559, 104 Ohio St. 3d 654 (Ohio 2004).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The certified question of state law is answered in the affirmative on the authority of In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

McFadden & Associates Co., L.P.A., and David A. Freeburg, for petitioner, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Lisa Pierce Reisz, for respondent, Frederick L. Ransier III, trustee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nowak
820 N.E.2d 335 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
821 N.E.2d 559, 104 Ohio St. 3d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gill-ohio-2004.