In re Gill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gill

30 A.D.2d 659, 292 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3564

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 659 (In re Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gill, 30 A.D.2d 659, 292 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered January 8, 1968, unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. The court does not reach or determine the question as to its power, in a proceeding for declaration of incompetency, to make an allowance to the attorneys for an incompetent under proper circumstances. Concur — Eager, J. P., McGivern Rabin and McNally, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., concurs in the result but would affirm without prejudice to the pursuit of any other remedy appellant may have.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered January 8, 1968, unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. The court does not reach or determine the question as to its power, in a proceeding for declaration of incompetency, to make an allowance to the attorneys for an incompetent under proper circumstances. Concur — Eager, J. P., McGivern Rabin and McNally, JJ.; Capozzoli, J., concurs in the result but would affirm without prejudice to the pursuit of any other remedy appellant may have.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 659, 292 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gill-nyappdiv-1968.