In re Giles

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Giles

77 A.3d 1008, 2013 WL 5648502

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 17, 2013·No. No. 13-BG-1063·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Giles has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on July 11, 2013, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Giles, 741 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1999), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leroy E. Giles, Jr., Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Giles has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on July 11, 2013, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Giles, 741 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1999), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leroy E. Giles, Jr., Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

In re Giles, 77 A.3d 1008, 2013 WL 5648502 (D.C. 2013).

Pincite

77 A.3d 1008 (In re Giles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related