In re Gibson

104 F. App'x 297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 2004
DocketNo. 04-6657
StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. App'x 297 (In re Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gibson, 104 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Geramie Gibson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) ease. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although there was a significant delay in the district court, we note that the magistrate judge has recently issued a recommendation in Gibson’s § 2241 case, and we are confident that the district court will proceed to a disposition in a timely manner. Accordingly, while we grant Gibson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gibson-ca4-2004.