In re Giancarlo P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Giancarlo P.

306 A.D.2d 28, 761 N.Y.S.2d 165, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6197

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 2003·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Helen Sturm, J.), entered on or about May 8, 2002, dismissing a child protective proceeding alleging educational neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The child’s prolonged, unexcused absence from school does not, ipso facto, establish either the parental misconduct or the harm or potential harm to the child necessary to a finding of neglect under Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A) (see Matter of Jessica Y., 161 AD2d 368 [1990]; Matter of Jennifer N., 173 AD2d 971, 972 [1991]). A preponderance of the evidence shows that respondent was actively engaged with school authorities in the process of securing an appropriate and specific special education placement for the child, and there is no evidence that the [29]*29child’s education was adversely affected by his absence from school. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Helen Sturm, J.), entered on or about May 8, 2002, dismissing a child protective proceeding alleging educational neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The child’s prolonged, unexcused absence from school does not, ipso facto, establish either the parental misconduct or the harm or potential harm to the child necessary to a finding of neglect under Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A) (see Matter of Jessica Y., 161 AD2d 368 [1990]; Matter of Jennifer N., 173 AD2d 971, 972 [1991]). A preponderance of the evidence shows that respondent was actively engaged with school authorities in the process of securing an appropriate and specific special education placement for the child, and there is no evidence that the [29]*29child’s education was adversely affected by his absence from school. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.

In re Giancarlo P., 306 A.D.2d 28, 761 N.Y.S.2d 165, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

306 A.D.2d 28 (In re Giancarlo P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related